# Transition Insight → routed paid AudioBoost

Use this reference when designing the Cosmos Luminosity funnel after a short free transition insight.

## Layer discipline

Do not confuse these layers:

1. **Awareness content** — recognition and language for the situation.
2. **Free short insight** — 4–6 minutes; combines answers into one possible interpretation and one way to test it.
3. **Paid trial product** — a result-routed AudioBoost, not another questionnaire.
4. **Deeper paid product** — fuller transition architecture after the woman has experienced the method.

If the free insight already asks questions, the paid trial must create a different kind of value. Do not propose a second assessment, map, worksheet, or future-scenario questionnaire.

## Routed AudioBoost model

The existing free result selects one of a small number of general AudioBoosts. Personalization belongs in:

- the short explanation of why this AudioBoost is being offered;
- the routing choice;
- the bounded real-life experiment after listening.

The recording itself is a general authored work. Never call it a personalized recording or imply that it knows the woman's individual future.

A strong route is:

> short inquiry → possible interpretation → relevant AudioBoost → one real-life experiment → three-question review

Suggested review:

1. What did I expect?
2. What actually happened?
3. What did this help me see and realize?

## Five useful routing territories

- preserve what the woman wants to carry forward;
- move beyond a former role;
- protect the support the current work provides while changing work;
- take a next step without a final choice;
- restore enough resources to hear herself again.

Protective routing wins: if depletion makes every option feel equally impossible, route to state and discernment rather than a career-direction AudioBoost.

## Commercial boundary

The free insight is not the paid trial. The routed AudioBoost can be the paid trial. A test price discussed in this project was USD 39, but price remains a transaction hypothesis until real purchases.

Do not publicly expose internal funnel language such as `paid trial product`, `pattern`, `hypothesis`, `evidence review`, or `routing`. Present the actual experience and outcome.

Do not put a fake purchase CTA on an unavailable AudioBoost. Before audio exists, show an honest availability status. Publish a purchase CTA only when the recording, delivery, terms and checkout are working.

## Human-language standard

Internal CL architecture may use `pattern`, `hypothesis`, `signals`, `identity`, `container`, `discernment`, `evidence`, and `transition architecture`. Reader-facing copy should usually translate these into ordinary situations and actions.

Prefer:

- “what your answers may be pointing to” over “possible reading”;
- “what may be happening with your work” over “transition pattern”;
- “what you want to keep” over “preserve the living”; 
- “try one small experiment” over “create an external probe”;
- “what happened in real life” over “evidence”; 
- “do you have enough resources to feel the difference?” over “restore discernibility.”

Write the concrete human version first. Keep conceptual terminology for internal strategy unless Margarita explicitly approves it for public use.

## Approval workflow for copy-heavy product pages

When Margarita reviews by voice in multiple parts:

1. preserve every approved replacement exactly;
2. record unresolved phrases separately with 2–4 alternatives;
3. do not publish partial edits while the review is still moving through the page;
4. wait for explicit completion/approval;
5. assemble the full clean Russian copy first;
6. publish and verify Russian;
7. translate/adapt English only afterward.

Do not silently choose among two versions mentioned in the same voice note. State which version you inferred and ask only if the final choice cannot be recovered from sequence/context.